I love HC and it's inability sometimes to post when on the...

I love HC and it's inability sometimes to post when on the mobile.

@SiFi3006
No, it's not a crime. But like I mentioned earlier, I sold and not once did I come back spreading negative energy. Why would I waste my time? I'm on to my next investment and focusing my energy there.

Yes, it's awesome to have both sides argued, the positives and the negatives discussed. But comments like "there are a million times better specks out there" (I know it wasn't you who said this) is not helpful.

I apologise at calling you a down-ramper, I guess I lumped you in the same basket as the others. Many come on HC and FUD the forums to try and gain a better entry to a project. Others are funded to do so. I despise that as some investors blindly follow and end up losing. End of the day, what someone says on here does not affect the SP of a project. It just annoys the sh*ts out of me.

I can't talk for fellow investors, but I don't have negative associations with credit raises. If OAR need to raise, fine. Investors need to move on from the negatives with CR's. You need money to drill.My intrigue here, could be a gamble also – as the ASX like a casino at times, are OAR's projects and potential, the appointment of Stephen to MD role and Gale (take LRS to $1B+ mc). That leads me to OAR's big brother is LRS. I'm confident OAR can replicated their success. In Latin's early days, many rubbished Gale. Similar conversations are being shared now.

IMO, I feel 2023-24 will be an exciting and evolving period for OAR. And that's why I'm invested here.