Just to add.
Holders and investors alike should note these results are from 2 holes. (And pretty good ones).
So only tells you what occurs in these finite areas of the ore body.
It would be good if a bulk composite sample leach was done next. Or multiple holes (like 100-200m spatials) and leached individually.
Essentially can compare holes to eac other and extrapolate across body.
or
the 'composite' you grab a bit from each hole across the orebody laterally and across depth. This in turn provides recovery results which can then (for the most part) be considered representative across the entire ore body and is what you would need to understand if all of the area is ionic and/or small portions.
Note, IMO* if these areas are highly ionic - it's probably that the other areas are as well but i would hazard a guess to not the same extent. (which is ok).
Again - this probably sounds like i'm being picky but i'm really just indicating next step IMO now this one has been ticked off. So re-iterate that the recoveries are actually quite good. In those particular holes the results are high. If that's similar across the ore body it is arguably better than peers. my comments around the risks/challenges ahead remain as per previous post. Post #:
56826791
Definitely puts ABX ahead of peers with IAC confirmed. Only a few of those around.
Establishing the processing method here and there Economic viability next hurdle.
Along with some more drilling to underpin a larger resource for a SS hopefully.
SF2TH
