bit of everything but more likely illegal shortingits just not...

bit of everything but more likely illegal shorting
its just not possible to borrow 3-5 mill stock from diversified retailers outside the top 20
no one identifiable inside the top 20 lent any
cant depend on covering shorts from last three days by stock allocations from cap raise issued tomorrow
thats illegal too
using loophole asx regs
“Seems to apply to recce with many one share upticks over the day“There's another rule that is not well known. You're not allowed to short sell into a price that is lower than the last executed price. It's meant to be a protection mechanism. But, interestingly, if you look at the course of sales over the past month for ABR, like recce last few days, you can see single buys or sells going on that have both a lower and a higher price in the one trade. That says to me an algo is working it, keeping within the rules. “


refer
As per asx rules Section 19.3.7 Note marketable parcel rules hence the number of small trades down to 1 share to keep the rules at bay F me loophole



is it likely for the asx to pursue compliance?
not really as source is big fellas offshore
g sachs
merrill lynch etc
how could they anyway
just get stonewalled

relax guys next few anns will blow these guys outta the water

this is not a stock loosely held enough to play algo games just wait and see