With respect to you zecs, I think it is implicit in the RECCE...

With respect to you zecs, I think it is implicit in the RECCE article that the MIC for each pathogen was the basis for the comments they made. At that species determined MIC level, and in some cases, for lower levels than that MIC, there appears to be no tendency for those particular pathogens to develop resistance. If that is correct, and that is the aim of the research as far as it is here reported, that is good, is it not?
Whatever the limits of toxicity are in humans, or the limits of concentration due to rapid excretion, that does not necessarily mean that R327 is not effective for the purposes it may be used for. I agree that the science there is not entirely clear about what all the limits of practical use are in all cases. But that is why their research is being done surely?
But equating it with bleach are somewhat disingenuous. I do not think it is exactly the same at all. I am fairly sure that R327 is considerably more effective as an antimicrobial agent in plasma than bleach without anything approaching the toxicity of bleach that would do the same job on the bugs. Or are you saying that is not correct? If so, I'd like to see some evidence for that assertion.