Share
11,400 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 565
clock Created with Sketch.
13/04/18
17:27
Share
Originally posted by TagH
↑
I appreciate the work that has gone into this chart ... but it’s v. misleading
# when SRs are below 4-5 it seems that the operation mines more much ore than the processing plant can handle
[from Jan’s announcement “during Feb’18, the operation is expected to mine approximately twice as much high grade ore as it will process, providing strong operational flexibility” ... this distorts the AISC (biased upwards) ... gives payback when opening up new satellite pits in the 3-4 year mine plan]
- we don’t have the full explanation for why March stockpiles didn’t go up but the previous month’s rainfall /
lightning surely had something to do with it
# ASIC is a combination of underground and open pit operations ... the chart above assumes purely O/C ops
# in the December Qtr they were effectively mining waste .. combination of higher SR but heavy rainfall impacts (where overheads and operational equipment remained idled for a good portion of time)
- not forgetting grade control issues which increased processing costs
- essentially everything was xxxx’d up last year that increased AISC
# investment in exploration from free cashflows will surely extend life of pits (even current, imcluding u/g ops) and bring fwd ‘free milling’ options (reduction in power costs, which are significant for any mining op)
in summary, the chart is not good guidance for future performance IMHO (but thanks for the effort)
Expand
... you should study correlation vs causation and why all of this doesn't actually make the chart less useful or indicative but actually more so.
The fact there are a huge amount of factors with some or many unknowns to the investor until after the fact does not disrupt correlation to major cost factors.
Thanks for the feedback but I don't think that 'everything was xxxx'd' up last year is solid science...