I haven't investigated. And I am no expert, but it seems like on the face of it the share price range and liquidity would not have prevented them from buying the same parcel on market at a similar or cheaper price (though over an undefined duration of time, obviously). If that logic is sound, there simply must be a specific incentive to pay the premium and organise the placement, instead of buying on market. That incentive is not disclosed.
Thoughts?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RFX
- Ann: Redflow secures c$2.5million at 30% premium
Ann: Redflow secures c$2.5million at 30% premium, page-22
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RFX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
9.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $25.63M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
RFX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable