if the so called evidence about Novamatic was laid bare, that...

if the so called evidence about Novamatic was laid bare, that would defeat the purpose.

you have to make an assumption on a logical basis with the facts you have at your disposal.

basically, all you have said is you acknowledge that you may be wrong, but nonetheless, you decided to have a "sizable bet" with your hard earned.

in conclusion, you then say because you have backed your own assessment, that then implies your thesis on AGI must be correct.

that is totally illogical and anyone who follows this concept of reasoning is not going to make dough on the ASX.

cheers crazypunter