what if the strategic pays in part for Renard ? As in an equity owner of the Renard hub, as apposed to their equity in WR1 ? Or that government infrastructure invests in same?
"Winsome is assessing various commercial and corporate opportunities to potentially
defray costs associated with the acquisition and development of Renard"
I dont see a disaster here. Rather the opposite. The potential way forward. And what does a market pay for a crowned king ? A low capex developer with strategic on board ?
Stop thinking disaster, and start thinking value come developer.
A disaster is all the other pretenders. We are emerging as a shining star.
Ann: Renard Project Update, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 276 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WR1 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
49.0¢ |
Change
0.005(1.03%) |
Mkt cap ! $106.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 48.0¢ | 49.5¢ | 46.5¢ | $161.0K | 336.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30000 | 47.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 49.5¢ | 18235 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WR1 (ASX) Chart |