WOW!
You sure spend a lot of time jumping at shadows. I can't imagine that you would hold shares in any company - no business is conducted without risk.
You have not provided one single fact
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...3996901/page-15?post_id=30764236#.WodjnqiWbtR
Is no more than you saying what if their forecast doesn't happen and you provide no FACTS to suggest it wont.
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...3996901/page-44?post_id=30767014#.WodjpqiWbtR
Again you what if X doesn't happen. Do you ever ask yourself what if they are understated. Notwithstanding, again you have not stated one FACT
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...ntary-suspension.4016434/reply?quote=31124866
AFR Article - really - What FACTS suggest BUD negligence - you seem desperate to compare two companies on the basis of similar ASX enquiries - There is no correlation whatsoever - even if both are guilty or both innocent of an identical charge - that would be coincidence.
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...996901/page-144?post_id=30794821#.Wodjq6iWbtR
Your opinion not FACT
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...996901/page-175?post_id=30806062#.WodjraiWbtR
More comparison of stocks, nothing related to the ASX Aware querey - irrelevant to the argument
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...4002415/page-40?post_id=30870283#.WodjtKiWbtR
This one is my favourite and partly why I continue.
Apart from your misguided obsession with tarring all with the same brush you say
"BUD: makes bold forecast of committed revenues of $69m"
I ask once again:
So thanks for collating all your posts (All I might add from OTHER threads). I hope my response helps you to understand the difference between your doomsday opinion and FACT.
- What is your basis for determining that the forecast is bold?
- Where does BUD claim committed revenues of $69?
