"....how difficult is it to make it known clearly how many Ohms...

"....how difficult is it to make it known clearly how many Ohms have been sold so far and how many more next quarter and if wanting to make forecast then do so clearly for next quarter or half ." Yeah, that would be transparent. Being transparent is not being ambiguous, think you guys take transparent as sounding frank ...we could also say that GSW was being transparent about saying that they do not announce MoU (implying their announcements are the real deal). Why state such big forecast (especially not guaranteed and based on poor premises or basis) if it is unlikely to be met after contradicting it saying the distribution sales takes time to gain traction (within same announcement)? Only reason is I told you so it takes time so if 4C shows no sales, I told you so...but everyone was just looking at the big forecast (including the instos who bought in at the CR). Its like BIG announcing incredibly large quarter to quarter growth on cash revenues (but few ask what cash revenues meant and why they were distinct to revenues; well, it includes substantial prepayments).