Ann: ResApp announces positive results of COVID-19 screening test, page-428

"and if you do you will be trampled by the drunk herd" – It is your inaccuracies that are getting trampled. So far your incorrect claims include:

1. Asymptomatic people cannot be diagnosed. This is directly contradicted by the announcement you are discussing.
2. Those without a cough cannot be diagnosed. The company has explained many, many times that a voluntary cough is just as useful as an involuntary one.
3. That Resapp has been operating since 2005 (indicated in your graph above). Resapp was acquired from University of Queensland at the end of 2014. Any share price action prior to that time has nothing to do with Resapp.
4. That the "pharmaceutical industry" will attempt to "discredit the science" at every step. Well "the science" has been out there for at least five years now without any sign of a campaign by anything you might call a "pharmaceutical industry".
5. That somebody could "fake a cough to get the positive/ negative result you want". This spectacularly stupid comment implies that a person has voluntary control over the tissues and structures of their respiratory tract.
6. "and peer views, have there been any". Shows your complete lack of any kind of research. The company website lists many peer reviewed papers published on Resapp research.
7. "it has some strong competition". What competition? Go on... give is a list.
8. "I think they [China] would prefer to purchase the tech from other providers such as MIT or Cambridge". Except that MIT and Cambridge don't have the tech!

>> 1 and 2: are you distorting me posts? I dont recall making these claims, please provide links
>> 3. answered in my post above
>> 4. answered in my post above
>> 5. the app measures sound and the sound of coughs can be manipulated. As such can the app be tricked! This needs to be investigated using the scientific method; not using your opinion.
>> 6. answered in my post above
>> 7 and 8: clearly contradicted in my post above