This is a really sweeping generalisation. Any textbook will say one thing looks a certain way or another. IMO this does not address the circumstances here.
As has been said by others, this director remains a director of the Singapore subsidiary.
The Singapore subsidiary is doing very well IMO. And 60% owned by Ci1.
So why is there a need for a transition, this director is still well and truly involved via the subsidiary?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Resignation of Director and Final Interest Notice
This is a really sweeping generalisation. Any textbook will say...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CI1 (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
11.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.685M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CI1 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online