Ann: Resource at Amayapampa increased , page-9

"grades are so low they arnet even consider grades by other miners"

Well Ctindale. That is a laugh.
I remember last year you extolling the virtues of some Aussie miner that was in production and saying how much better it was than RAU in terms of the grades it had.

Yet when I checked out your claim I discovered that the company in question had two areas that it had results for and that one of the areas (their main area if I remember correctly) had gold grades that were generally lower than either FNQ or Amayapampa.
Their other area had some limited results that were on a par with some of the better grades RAU has at FNQ and Amayapampa.

So if that comapny can be in production in Australia with the results it showed then there will be no problem for RAU.

Your claims, as usual, are spurious.