Why is this storm in a tea cup - $4.56million is hardly small...

Why is this storm in a tea cup - $4.56million is hardly small change unless I'm reading this wrong - the half yearly had 33,462,000 the 4c had 38,028,000 in receipts? I think the way they've displayed these numbers is a little easy to make the mistake that they're talking thousands when in relaity they're actually talking millions!

Re-read with the actual real numbers shown instead of just a k on the end and it begins to look a lot different.

The cashflow may work out the same overall but its the make of off that cashflow which indicates the true picture...no storm in a tea cup IMHO

To many so called "Internal Accounting Errors"....IMHOO