Agree - mine site personnel/management would have known this...

  1. 5,468 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 4504
    Agree - mine site personnel/management would have known this late in the quarter from many many previous weekly and month-end survey pickups and reconciliations that copper production was already in a bit of a hole.

    In my opinion we saw elevated volumes of MLX traded on the ASX on the 8th March and the 12th March in a market that was operating partly misinformed.

    Thats an disingenious response to the ASX query, and heres the reason, on the 7th March when the power goes out they know they only have 20 days left in the current Quarter - thats a potential 40 shifts worth of mining left in the quarter and on the 8th March they probably knew that the electricians and mine guys would be up for a 3 to 4 day fix to get power back on - so thats a loss of 6-8 shifts of production from a potential 40 shifts left in the quarter so that equals a decrease of mine availibility of 15-20% in the remaining quarter. Losing 6-8 shifts of production in a normal 90 day quarter assuming two 12 hour shifts per day is a productivity loss of around 4% of available shifts. All of this sounds to me like something that I would describe as "material", unless MLX management think that they are entitled to some new dates in the calendar, do I hear the 34th March 2019 anyone.

    I get it that things go wrong in mining, especially with ageing infrastructure, and the guys on site have actually done pretty well getting a major outage like that fixed over 3-4 days in a remote location with limited access to spares. My question is more aimed at MLX management - given its the weekend - how hard would it have been to update the market first thing on Monday morning? By then the sparkies would have known that power would be restored later that day because the repairs would have been around 75% completed by then.....

    Thats a black mark next to their names in the disclosure department - I will be reducing my exposure to them as there are heaps of other companies who at least can keep their shareholders informed of operational matters. If MLX management can't be honest and timely about a simple straightforward power outage, why would shareholders beleive anything they have to say about more complex matters ,that slowly evolve, like changes in production stopes, grade cutoffs or grade control, development metres, safety problems, seismic and geotechnical events, workforce, equipment or infrastructure disruptions?

    They've only got two operations, so if something went really wrong at Renison while Nifty has its problems then we can only assume that that the first we would be hearing about it would be from the administrators!
    Last edited by eastwest101: 15/03/19
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
57.0¢
Change
0.025(4.59%)
Mkt cap ! $505.2M
Open High Low Value Volume
55.0¢ 58.0¢ 55.0¢ $2.022M 3.573M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
2 19522 56.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
57.0¢ 50000 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
MLX (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.