Sounds like you are pretty positive that the ASX will accept a hydrogen "idea" - that hasn't been costed and relies on presumptions - as more being material than the abandonment of the Borba commercialisation strategy - which was intended to produce near term revenues.
I suppose a junior with ~$1.1 million in the bank last quarter didn't feel the need to explain to the ASX how it would fund such a "pivot".
Funding requirements for Canada and the Philippines are/will be material.
Funding requirements for Borba were material.
So when does abandoning a project defined by a clear, re-iterated intention (connect to a gas pipeline) become immaterial?
Above is not financial advice and my opinion only.
Ann: Response to ASX Aware Query, page-65
Add SGC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.458M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3533365 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8¢ | 1889499 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.09am 30/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGC (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable