Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

AVZ

Click for more information

0.00%

78.0¢ avz minerals limited

Ann: Response to ASX Price and Volume Query, page-41

First 41 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
drcoffee

19 Posts.

07/06/18

15:21

Post #: 33568090
Share

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by Obe wan ↑

My theory is that he wants it sold....and he's lit the trail

Expand

Re option 2. If only we had a shareholder with recent experience of doing this

AVZ Price at posting: 9.3¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Week 41 Wrap: HotCopper asks “Back to Mongolia?” for Elixir; US CPI comes in at 2.4%; eyes still on China

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

A3D

Defence MOU for propulsion systems pushes Aurora Lab shares higher

TIG

Tigers Realm's US$49M sale of Russian assets – to a Kremlin-adjacent billionaire – set to go ahead

CXU

Cauldron Energy reports "excellent" uranium assays in latest drill run

There are more pages in this discussion • 88 more messages in this thread...

First 41 Last

Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist