Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

AVZ

Click for more information

0.00%

78.0¢ avz minerals limited

Re option 2. If only we had a shareholder with recent experience...

First 41 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
drcoffee

19 Posts.

07/06/18

15:21

Post #: 33568090
Share

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by ozblue ↑

The more I think about what has happened today, the more I'm pondering the different possibilities.
1. It would not surprise me to see ASX/ASIC decide to get involved. A chairman of a company dumping millions of FREE shares in the middle of a drilling campaign while trying to get some Chinese investors on board via a JV or offtake etc, is going to more than just raise a few eyebrows.
This 'please explain' from the ASX is just the first shot across the bow. I would not be surprised if we were suspended pending further inquiries.

2. How can Klaus remain Chairman of the company after effectively sinking the ship?? It only takes a request from 5% of existing shareholders to call an extra ordinary meeting to remove a director. Does anyone think there would be any difficulty in getting such a motion up??
I can't see how AVZ will have any respect from any quarter with Klaus remaining as a director. I'm very surprised he has not resigned already.
Klaus was the managing director of AVZ on a salary of ~$180,000/yr for 4 years before the Manono deal came along. When it was voted that he received 80M FREE shares for 'organising the deal', I was more than surprised. It was an aspect that made me keep my original shares last year for only a short time.

Isn't the salary of the MD the reward for getting deals done?? Why should extra shares be given for doing one's job?? It is something I'll definitely be more than wary of in the future, as those free shares have not only added to dilution, they have just kicked shareholders in the guts.

IMHO I don't think Klaus realises what a HUGE mistake he has just made over the last week.

Expand

Originally posted by Obe wan ↑

My theory is that he wants it sold....and he's lit the trail

Expand

Re option 2. If only we had a shareholder with recent experience of doing this

AVZ Price at posting: 9.3¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

CUF

CuFe sells its Crossroads gold royalty to Northern Star for $4M cash; says better than waiting for mine launch

CLE

Cyclone signs MOU with Vale for development of Iron Bear play

BTH

Bigtincan's Board backs Investcorp offer: Why a NASDAQ listing could be game-changing

EEG

NT Gov't delivers environmental approval for Empire Energy's Beetaloo Carpentaria pilot gas play

HotCopper Highlights: Your most watched stocks for Week 46, 2024

3DA

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

GDM

Banshee's historic trenches prove rich in antimony and gold for GDM

BNL

Blue Star Helium sees approval for five more wells at 'Galactica/Pegasus' project in Colorado

IRX

InhaleRX gains approval for clinical trial to test non-opioid therapy for cancer pain

Week 46 Wrap: Copper hits 2mth low as Trump threatens net zero pace; US rally fades; HotCopper’s picks

First 41 Last

Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist

SPONSORED BY