Because I was not wrong, and instead it was your reading...

Because I was not wrong, and instead it was your reading comprehension that was severely impacted by your bias towards the company.

This is what I wrote:


The answer to the first question could be, "not many"...

...and yet your response is:



You are trying to refute a claim that I HAVE NEVER MADE.

You are imagining things much like how everyone here is deluding themselves into thinking that everything is okay.

You said:



So why are you equating them both, especially considering the fact that GMV was not investigated by ASIC.

Now you are expressing petulant outburst....


If I am not worth your time then that is your prerogative.