"..the store in Tianjin referred to in the article, does not belong to Aurigin Foods. It was an existing established store selling Australian products and owned by a third party. To assist in lifting its profile the store was given the opportunity to trial under the Aurigin name."
Even if this is 100% accurate, which I find hard to believe, how is this not material to advise shareholders of when proposing the sale of Aurigin Foods? i.e. the store using the name would have had 1+ months worth of sales to report back on, did the branding help? Were any products used in the store that DAU spent thousands of dollars on (according to this release)? How well did they sell?
"Ms Guo is not a shareholder of Columbus Minerals Pty Ltd and does not exercise control or influence over the conduct of the affairs of Columbus Mineral Pty Ltd."
Yeah, right. /rolleyes
Mind boggling how much these directors are being paid for the little amount of progress they have made for DAU shareholders.
Ann: Response to ASX Query, page-2
Add ZAG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.7¢ |
Change
-0.003(15.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.51M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.8¢ | 1.8¢ | 1.7¢ | $12.67K | 735.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 200000 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0¢ | 424246 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.11am 15/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
1.7¢ |
Change
-0.003 ( 10.5 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 1.8¢ | 1.8¢ | 1.7¢ | 275871 | ||
| Last updated 11.11am 15/05/2024 ? | |||||
| ZAG (ASX) Chart |