Why shouldnt these be cancelled also?
https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20180514/pdf/43v05qh4bkj0qj.pdf
Also how are these classed as "unrelated parties" went both Gilboa and Malik are executives of the company? for "Faciliting Cistic Poly agreement" - Is there revenue and sales for this?
"Paid for services during the company's relisting in 2016" shouldn't this be in the prospectus then?
They look to be paid pretty well according to the Annual report.
Why shouldnt these be cancelled also?...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DTZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
13.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(3.57%) |
Mkt cap ! $70.70M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 13.0¢ | 13.5¢ | 12.0¢ | $168.7K | 1.288M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61185 | 12.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0¢ | 176923 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DTZ (ASX) Chart |