yes, even as I dive into it more it really turns muddy waters. I...

yes, even as I dive into it more it really turns muddy waters.

I guess some of the services would not be in any previous agm or reports as the former director Moti, choose to issue share instead of cash payments as a measure of cost cuttings. The whole market knows that the company is on the verge of commercial success and with the SP being low as it was an inciting offer to pay the debts with shares. At which at a later nearby date, could flip for a higher amount (that's probably the Yarn moti sold instead of cash payments).

The technicalities between unrelated then associated with entities etc... I don't know the clear boundary. Another company is another legal entity which acts in its own interest. Best leave it to the asx to prod and probe to find if it is all legit or Moti's influence was greater than just to issuing himself performance shares.

It could be all techincally legit... or if it looks like a scam, smells like a scam... it probably is.