It may well be the reason the tenant is related is the appetite in the market for these assets is thin or non existent? Is it possible the very reason RFM need to be tenant is others are less interested to operate these assets? Is it possible therefore that the rents being paid are in fact overstated?
It may well be the reason the tenant is related is the appetite...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RFF (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.07 |
Change
0.020(0.98%) |
Mkt cap ! $803.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.04 | $2.08 | $2.04 | $1.405M | 680.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4024 | $2.05 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.07 | 23029 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RFF (ASX) Chart |