Yes, Nigel expected a ML after the favourable technical opinions and the decree, as the law would have suggested. Corrupt players then played their games to prevent this from going ahead. What would you have done differently to make sure you achieved the ML? And what would the "New Blood" specifically do to get a favourable result for shareholders? Please see if you can address this question, if this is the outcome, you'd like to achieve why you would not attempt to convince people. Do you think "Your head is in the sand" is getting the "New Blood" any votes?
I am more than happy to reply to you all day as your lack of arguments and dribble is doing more harm to the "New Blood" case amongst the Mum and Dad shareholders. Please don't stop.
Ann: Response to shareholder communications from Fat Tail, page-347
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?