Hahaha what is this? How does any of this address the issue at...

Hahaha what is this? How does any of this address the issue at hand? I asked you what he’d do differently, what his approach would be. I mean even if you don’t know for sure the specifics, surely you can give some rough outlines or just speculations? Why are you forwarding his résumé? He’s already outlined his qualifications and work history on the MMGA site, this isn’t anything nobody knows by now

This doesn’t tell anyone anything abt what Peter is going to do for SHs if he’s on he board again. Please, enlighten us as to why we should vote for Peter, not why we shouldn’t vote for Nigel, cos Nigel’s not up for re-election. We’re here to understand why Peter should be on the board, and don’t start again with the “new blood” spiel, cos Peter’s not new blood, he’s just abt as old as they come here lol