You are no doubt referring to the generic risk disclaimer that...

You are no doubt referring to the generic risk disclaimer that runs of the legal practitioners word processor for every prospectus which is the standard arse covering clause used by all and sundry.
Risk is one thing but screwing up to this level demonstrates how badly management has dealt with the basics and no amount of lipstick can disguise this
For RENT to have run up the white flag and cap in hand trotted of to the market twice in a 10 month period since the original fundraising is nothing short of breathtaking.
This has been at a huge cost of dilution and management credibility.
This third CR done at 15 cents with fees of $600,000 and a free hit to an under witter of 10,000,00 options in my view is a disgrace.
The existing shareholders took a very dim view and voted with there feet with 69% saying NO!