Is your reason for moving the discussion to this thread, to highlight the electrochemical testing that EGR undertook in 2020, NL? The fully disclosed data was presented and explained... unlike the so-called "optimised" study of RNU's in which statements are not backed by evidential data. Is that your point? Or is your point that tap density is one way of ascertaining "range or discharge rate" and that EGR have carried out testing using both physical and electrochemical methods already. However, is it possible that with improving technologies that EGR has yet to test Epanko and Merelani graphite in an optimised study which it is currently undertaking perhaps?
Ann: Results Confirm Superior Performing EcoGraf Battery Material, page-214
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EGR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
11.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(12.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $54.48M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 12.5¢ | 12.5¢ | 11.0¢ | $11.37K | 98.95K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35564 | 11.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5¢ | 24906 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.20am 24/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EGR (ASX) Chart |