I think there's obviously them, with all the linked holdings...

I think there's obviously them, with all the linked holdings increasing constantly (according to sub holder notices and regular top holder lists).. but, I also believe there is another big player that was hoping to get their chunk, hoping to via a small CR, not wanting the noroa resolution to pass!
SGH were selling down, and offloading some of their noroa at 0.001!
I don't even know which sub holders have the noroa.. but, there's definitely (in my opinion) certain people who haven't wanted the other big players getting it all.
Makes you wonder about some posting on HC.. why would some long term sell/not held's be so outraged and fixated on such a seemingly irrelevant issue, and be attempting to persuade holders to vote a certain way, which would've been strangely negative for the company!
Funny that no-one listened!
I wonder where the 37m for votes came from.. been alot of shares moving holdings lately.. were they some ineligible votes (noroa holders) moving to new accounts that were eligible?.. or just plenty of holders voting on it?
All my opinion, and 100% deadset fact!