RED, don't get too carried away as only 8.5% voted and we did get a second strike, and almost a spill. Company hasn't accepted this strike by changing the remuneration asap, which is totally unacceptable imo. So why do I have to accept anything, far from it! I don't consider my comments negative but factual imo. Again, prove my comments wrong!!!!
The reality is this, just one little holder - me, against a full-on 88, heavily paying 3rd parties by phoning/begging/harassing holders for 3-4 weeks and combined with the lies, misleading and fear campaign flooded on here by a small few in an attempt to worry some holders to not support my recommendations, lol....
I think as only 1 small holder who made a stand against this lifestyle coy imo over the past couple of weeks has seriously given this board a necessary serious big scare, especially if a 249D eventuates in coming weeks after I conclude all my meetings of potential directors etc. Then all the so called "faceless directors" will actually make a stand and many holders would see the quality of highly professional, well-respected directors are all about. So RED lots to do and far from accepting any of 88's nonsense imo. Changes will happen!!!!
88 did nothing to help their cause by not spending quality time listening to holders. They had plenty of time to do a zoom webinar, BUT they couldn't care less imo and just wasted money on 3rd parties phoning around. That goes against what many of us holders expected. Basically, given us holders the bird imo, like they do by not responding to holders calls or emails.
I intended to meet with the board prior to AGM but after reading all these lies on here, decided to wait for the vote and see if 88 would invite holders to a webinar. But given the lack of interest from directors to liaise with holders in an open forum. Why should I now bother as they don't earn or have my respect. I now want them all gone!!!!
Thanks for your advice BUT I will do as I do, you will vote as you do, have a good day..
Expand
(20min delay)