Just a snippet from the code which directly goes to my...

Just a snippet from the code which directly goes to my point:

Whenever possible, an announcement under Listing Rule 3.1 should contain sufficient detail for investors to understand its ramifications and to assess its impact on the price or value of the company’s securities

Dropping a platform is clearly significant in relation to the value of the company. They have now disclosed they've done it, however, where is the sufficient detail for investors to understand and asses the impact????

They disclosed it but no information as to why. This is different to not being able to disclose information in relation to trials. This was a business decision and we don't have a clue as to why it was made. My criticism stands. My criticism is not in relation to how they run the trials or what the results are, my criticism is that they have made the decision to pull the plug on a platform and do not communicate why which gives me no ability to understand how pulling the plug is right or wrong. Obviously, they don't think it has any value anymore and is a drag on cost, however, that ought to be explained preferably with some numbers attached.

This was supposed to be a reply to Wedgeman's comment above, Don't know why it didn't work as a reply.