Ann: Results of Scheme Meeting , page-22

I heartily agree!

When an arguement is made, especially one that is well referenced etc, the correct thing to do is to respond in kind, ie presented a well worded, verifiable counter arguement. Descent to personal abuse and the use of censorship hardly address the issues, nor do they constitute informed debate.

As I said elsewhere "Unfortunately there are those amonst us who, when they are unable to make a reasoned response to unpleasant facts, resort to enlisting the censor RATHER THAN examine their own flawed logic! Censorship becomes the last (only?) refuge of these GOG patriots! (With apologies to Dr Johnson (who's original quote is the logical conclusion to THIS chain of thought!))"

TR