Whilst I wish Tim Hronsky every success if he has exited to pursue more challenging technical pastures. I have to question however why has SGQ accepted the retirement of the only technically qualified director in the trio? At this crucial stage of the exploration phase?
Helmenesh
Whilst I wish Tim Hronsky every success if he has exited to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $33.61M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 751080 | 3.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4¢ | 27961 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGQ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable