Ann: Retraction and clarification of statements, page-32

She’s infamous in trying to put companies on the spot. Lots of crap usually. She’s being sued for defamation few times in the past so... reading this article it’s a none issu really. She’s just trying to crusify BB. The way I read it the company did very well to clarify all his statements. Which were done mind ya in a small forum while shares were on trading halt. She’s also misleading readers arguing that BB said it’s 99% accuracy and that was wrong?? She’s right since it’s 100% accurate! Not 99% oh my. Rubbish. Can’t wait to resume back. What was missing from the article which is very annoying and I intend to send her an email about this is saying f*, an Australian/Israeli company - DTZ has developed a revolutionary technology to detected COVID rapidly, received regulatory approval already from the EU (CE) and going to submit to FDA shortly. This is the bottom line not the rest of the rubbish!