Constant rheteric against CLQ could be a slight issue.
If you are going to do a single company comparison the greater detail is required.
Ie There was no mention of CLQ water technology and whilst small should have been mentioned plus size of reserve etc.
Reference to R.Friedland was made at the Fremantle conference. Not damaging but a lawyer could argue ever so slightly tarnished.
There was no advantage in the comparison when it had been used so many times before.
Was it conduct of a MD or CEO? Only the repetitive nature was over the top. Possibly not use that comparison next time there is a presentation.
Ann: Retraction and re-release of presentation, page-68
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AUZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
0.001(11.1%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.98M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | $10.92K | 1.104M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 6690718 | 0.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0¢ | 1140262 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AUZ (ASX) Chart |