NEA 0.00% $2.10 nearmap ltd

Ann: Revenue guidance achieved, strong growth in 1HFY16, page-14

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 1,829 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 76
    Can I put an alternative view / interesting question? Consider this:

    1. "... at 30 November 2015, it had achieved $28m of Australian run rate revenue. This revenue run rate does not include a contribution from the new major customer win announced to the ASX on 7 December 2015."
    2. "For H1 FY2016, subscription revenues for the Australian business are expected to be between $13.3m and $13.7m."

    So if the run rate is already $28m p.a. why would not the run rate for H1 16 be at least that much, i.e. revenues for the first half of at least $14.0m? If they are expecting less than that, does it not imply falling run rate revenues?

    I don't get it.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add NEA (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.