0Thanks.. and yes, how you are explaining it basically sounds like there is no point at all in Yogi subbing, other than to comfort grange, knowing that if the share price plunges, he is still binding with his $100k.
What you are also saying is that if the price spikes, Paul could put in more, up to $422k...
But, imagine the non holder outrage on HC if he did!
I see you would be happy with him putting in $100k because Yogi is..
Why should you be able to assume how much $ Paul has available?
I see swagman is now sooking about Paul's input, as is DB2.
Do any of you have $40k available?
Do you/your family have other commitments, mortgage etc?
For all you people know, Paul could already be throwing everything he has in to his company..
People really should stop questioning a large investment of $40000.
Just because Yogi can find 100k, doesn't mean anyone else can.
Even if Paul was putting in 100k+, you lot would be outraged with conspiracies about him getting a heap of heavily discounted shares.
No matter how well the raise is set up for holders, you all whinge, no matter what. It couldn't be any fairer!
When the news comes and share price spikes, you will all be so angry
Loose gears especially.. I can't wait!
It really is a waste of time posting in the non holders whinge syndicate. Keep patting eachother on the back, doing a great job talking down a stock none of you hold! Thumbs up!!
