Figure 2 Shows the cross section of the drill results which we...

Figure 2 Shows the cross section of the drill results which we all have been waiting for.
There is however something that doesn’t add up to me with respects to the historical drill results and in particular to SL02-28 & SL02-29.
What doesn’t make sense to me is that this figure is a cross section based on the Northing of 5585125m. Looking at the bottom of the figure it confirms this as the Easting Ticks are at 25 m intervals in the easterly direction.
But if you compare the coords of the historical drilling results with the recent due diligence drilling results we can deduct that the recent drill holes are about 225m north of the historical drilling.

SL02-29 396936E 5584898N
SL02-29 396913E 5584899N

SL-16-41 396927E 5585199N
SL-16-42 396965E 5585125N

So either the historical drilling coordinates aren’t correct with relation to the recent drill results, or the cross section diagram is incorrect OR the strike runs for that 225m difference.



Anybody got a take on this?