Perhaps, but there's some really basic problems here - there's...

Perhaps, but there's some really basic problems here - there's apparently no variography been done and the drill results released so far indicate considerable grade variance. The block model has been estimated at 1/4 the minimum drill spacing without any geostatistical support. Likewise, the classification of the resultant (*ahem*) estimate of mineralisation is based on some arbitrary distances with absolutely no geostatistical support. I get the impression that the database is a series of spreadsheets and there's no commentary on Reasonable Prospects. And rather than using more sophisticated estimation techniques, the CP has time-warped back to the 60's to use IDW as a primary interpolation technique. None of that is supportive of a Measured classification and Indicated is highly debatable.