There is a more cost effective way for BHP shareholders with the...

  1. 11,652 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 471
    There is a more cost effective way for BHP shareholders with the Anglo play.

    Let Anglo pay for the costs of the non-performing assets via demergers, rather than BHP paying for them in a full takeover. Then pick off what you want even if you have to pay a premium the result would likley be better for BHP holders.

    Anglo will canabilise itself by trying to fend off BHP. I suspect that is what BHP is trying to force, drop the bid once Anglo commits to the demergers, and Anglo is at a point of no-return!
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
$36.48
Change
0.840(2.36%)
Mkt cap ! $185.1B
Open High Low Value Volume
$36.45 $36.60 $36.10 $321.8M 8.837M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 8 $36.47
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
$36.49 869 2
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.17pm 24/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
BHP (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.