They didn't say who picked up the shortfall so we simply don't...

  1. 4,052 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 637
    They didn't say who picked up the shortfall so we simply don't know for sure. A first sight I assumed it was the underwriter but thinking about Jack's comment earlier I suspect if we reverse engineer the number we get some idea. The underwriter was only on the hook for the first $750k. Entitlements accounted for just under $670k so underwriter would only have been on the hook for the next $80k. Therefore $600k of shortfall shares issues are unlikely to be the underwriter directly. Either over-subscriptions or underwriter placed them.

    No special insights about the money being spent. Likely just slowly disappear like the R&D money did.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
0.2¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $2.654M
Open High Low Value Volume
0.2¢ 0.2¢ 0.2¢ $210 104.8K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
64 38848316 0.2¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
0.3¢ 18281126 25
View Market Depth
Last trade - 12.28pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
BIT (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.