PEA 0.00% $1.01 pepper residential securities trust no. 30

It'll be pure, dispassionate arithmetic. Simplified example:...

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 291 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 135
    It'll be pure, dispassionate arithmetic.

    Simplified example:
    Suppose a shortfall of $1.0m and three shareholders oversubscribed, Shareholders A, B and C. A holds 2 shares, B holds 3 shares and C 5 shares. A oversubscribed by $1.0m, B by $0.6m and C by $0.2m.


    The outcome of this is that C gets their full oversubscription ($0.2m) as it's less than their maximum allocation proportionate to existing holdings. A and B take the remaining $0.8m in proportion to existing holdings - $0.32m for A and $0.48m for B.

    A and B would be returned cash of $0.68m and $0.12m respectively.

    Hope that makes sense.

    In reality the 24% of oversubscriptions will be dominated by the big existing holders, so any mortals will only have a trifling amount of shortfall shares. The shortfall itself was only 5% of the new shares to be created from the 1 in 9 rights issue, in other words 0.5% of the company's total number of shares on completion, so there aren't many to go around.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add PEA (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.