You forgot an asteroid strike wiping out the plant.
Of course there are risks; what investors are interested in - or should be - is discussion around the identification of the potential issues, the likelihood of those reasonably occurring, and what impact those things are actually likely to have on future outcomes and valuation.
The assessment of the haters stops with “massive dilution” and “more delays” and “capex blowout”, but absolutely FAILS to discuss these in any relevant detail, especially what the impact of reasonable potential scenarios might be on future operations and valuation.
It is really very simple.
You scratch the surface but refuse to get into the detail - which absolutely requires scenario modelling, risk assessment, and DCF analysis.
Imo you and Pierre and co are gamblers, who chased a shiny thing and got dazed when your profits evaporated. The frustration turns to anger and hatred, to the point of boldly asserting - as each of you have - that someone is lying about their holding, even when you have ZERO proof.
So yes, I’ll “have fun” with my models and my assessments, and continue to accumulate when the opportunity arises; For ME, the anticipated rewards FAR outweigh the delays along the way.
Oh, and I see you’re still distracted by shiny things and hindsight regarding “all the other opportunities” - good luck with that; afaict it ends in tears much much more often than not.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)