Considering Chalice proved that Julimar was a significant discovery with 6 drill holes with one amazing drill hole result and the other 5 were good, back in 2020. Is it possible to prove a significant find with only 3 drill holes and an auger soil sample at Thor? I'm guessing all 3 drill holes need to be amazing to be the same.
Considering Chalice proved that Julimar was a significant...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add VMS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $43.90M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.8¢ | $111.0K | 6.162M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 36 | 7999876 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 1680469 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| VMS (ASX) Chart |