Approx the same NPV at US$1,054m (DFS is -US$2m from PFS) but lots of things have changed behind the scenes of the number. Initial thoughts
- Resource increase, life of mine extended to 24 years (from 22y)
- Annual revenue up by US$30m to US$240m (great)
- Capex up by about US$300m or 200% increase (Yikes)
- Average production cost up by about $500/t
- Variable Talnode-C sale price used depending on stage of the project. Assume this is how overall numbers have been kept roughly in line with PFS
Doesn’t include a table with PFS figures for quick comparison which is disappointing (some may see this as a red flag, why hide it?)
Overal numbers look very robust but I have some questions about how they got there. Will need to spend some time to digest.
Ann: Robust DFS Paves Way For Talga Battery Anode Project, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 400 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add TLG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
41.5¢ |
Change
-0.015(3.49%) |
Mkt cap ! $157.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 43.0¢ | 44.3¢ | 40.8¢ | $456.3K | 1.059M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 19613 | 41.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0¢ | 20000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TLG (ASX) Chart |