too many lithium companies now only use high % lithium to attract traders for a day spike, whether they will be economical and production is X, but with the land size CXO holding, the rate they are having is far more acceptable. if they only has some 18km-58km2 blah blah ground size, that may not be good result..
think if we have more than 1% and that large land holding? it will be bigger than PLS if economical has been confirmed..
instead we have large land holding and less % so well expected result I say.
Ann: Rock chip assays confirm potential - Finniss Lithium Project-CXO.AX, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 162 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CXO (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
9.1¢ |
Change
-0.003(3.19%) |
Mkt cap ! $194.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 9.3¢ | 9.4¢ | 9.1¢ | $1.765M | 19.18M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 618024 | 9.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2¢ | 285600 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 25/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CXO (ASX) Chart |