"In summary, the expert concluded that wheezo® analyses breath sounds for the presence of a wheeze and that in
the expert’s opinion, breath sounds and wheezing are physiologic parameters."
This sounds ominous- the expert deliberately stopped short of saying the device could qualify for CPT, just that it measures wheeze and wheeze is a thing (didn't we know this already???)
And the response to ADRs statement about the device not qualifying for CPT in the US is also deliberately vague and doesn't even address (and therefore implicitly accepts) ADR's statement.
IMO IMO IMO IMO DYOR DYOR DYOR DYOR
Ann: RPM CPT Reimbursement & response to statements made by ADR, page-5
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(3.23%) |
Mkt cap ! $47.31M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.1¢ | 3.1¢ | 3.0¢ | $107.6K | 3.564M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 702000 | 2.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1¢ | 100000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.21pm 04/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| VHL (ASX) Chart |