they can't be 'apples and apples'
apt is a transactional based bnpl product. their loss rate can't be calculated using 'receivables' as the denominator. it's on 'total calendar loss'/ 'total calendar spend'
szl and apt should use the same loss rate methodology as they are both transactional. szl just copied apt business model....but that's another story
zip is a revolving bnpl product, so loss rates calculated using 'total end receivables' as denominator'.
it the end, it shouldn't really matter
apt loss rates are going down
zip going up
zip can use the same loss rate methodology as apt, but they will need to change their product contruct to match theirs
just like what szl did
they can't be 'apples and apples'apt is a...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ZIP (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.78 |
Change
-0.035(1.93%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.246B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.81 | $1.81 | $1.74 | $30.57M | 17.25M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 110725 | $1.77 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.78 | 29116 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ZIP (ASX) Chart |