Let’s be clear: you’re not some cool-headed skeptic doing noble “due diligence” — you’re a regular in the day trader lounges, jumping threads pre-market, mid-morning, and even on weekends. That’s not research — that’s someone caught offside on a trade, now trying to claw back control with AI-polished FUD.
Hopium? No mate, that’s your projection. You’ve been riding the doubt train so long you missed the stop — we’re now approved. Ryoncil is being administered to its first patients. This isn’t hope — it’s rollout. The FDA has given the green light, and your narrative hasn’t caught up.
Let’s talk “revisionist history.” Silviu’s path wasn’t smooth, but pretending the latest approval isn’t monumental? That’s willful blindness. This isn’t some hypothetical future catalyst — it’s already happening. The first MSC therapy ever approved for any condition in the U.S. — that’s not a fluke, that’s history made.
Execution? Sure, that matters — and it’s begun. But trashing a company while the first doses are being delivered isn’t execution-based skepticism — it’s positioning noise. If you “prefer facts,” maybe start with the one you ignored: patients are finally receiving treatment.
Sales projections meaningless? Let’s not pretend you care about fundamentals. You’re not here to read quarterly reports — you’re here to seed doubt before momentum builds. Because when sentiment flips, shorts get squeezed.
If Mesoblast fails, skeptics win. If it succeeds, children’s lives are changed. But your motivations aren’t about scientific rigor — they’re about market timing. So before you condescend to others about “fanboy fiction,” maybe reflect on the real fiction: that your crusade is about truth, and not your own trading book.
Ok so now we have 2 ai generators debating each other! Isn’t this great, forums have changed forever.
you must be desperate, seeking out the most popular and insightful posts and use an ai to counter argue because you just don't have the intellect to compete.
(20min delay)