It's a choice between someone who has put his soul, money, and...

It's a choice between someone who has put his soul, money, and the last 5 years of his life to go deep inside the company to calm down a past performer who's on the record as saying future dilution is necessary, while having taken an enormous sum in income like he's still working for Ivanhoe, and never put a cent back into the company to my knowledge.

The key is that Peter is struggling to raise funds, needs cap notes & blaming to survive, and Robert Friedland is still nowhere to be seen; the fact that Peter has been giving himself free shares instead of performance shares says he has no intention of putting any skin in the game at all.

It's ironic to see Peter while drowning swinging legal punches to keep his lifestyle alive while shareholders, most likely each and everyone, have been drowning in red for some time, against a threatening backdrop of losing it all.

Make no mistake about it, Peter will get first paid if the ship sinks, and against the laws of the sea, will most likely desert the ship and swim safely to the shore of his next cushy position.

Is this the man you want to lead the company unabated through the hard times?

Bring on John Bennett because he is perfectly aligned with the current shareholders & balls in motivated, whereas Peter is relying on fresh blood & monies entering for him to suck, and once Peter calms his ego down and sees reality, perhaps they can forged a strong team, for the benefit of all shareholders.

Imo