Ann: s.249D Notice of Meeting, page-7

So now the delays and lack of funds are due to Preempt...amazing. This is very ugly indeed.

So, was Preempt to blame for the repeated delays for the last two years and the collapse of the share price from 0.022 to 0.005? When most other uranium company peers have lost 40-50% in this sustained downturn, we've lost 80%+.

Was Preempt responsible for destroying everyone's wealth whilst Peter increased his own wealth with his zealous salary, his non-performance related bonuses and free shares.

A wage reduction by Peter, when the company is obviously struggling in a uranium demand drought environment, would have gone a long way to averting Preempt's need for his action. And I know there's been a recent cut-back notice, but that came after Preempt filed his initial 249D, along with a steady flow, almost overflow, of Aura updates and regular progress reports on social media that is almost alien to the news shy Aura Energy. I am pleased at long-last, that Peter and his team are doing what they should have been doing for many years and that is putting Aura in the shop window, generating interest.

If anyone missed the interview with Crux investor https://www.cruxinvestor.com/videos/aura-energy-asxaee-aim-aura-uranium-cashflow-to-support-world-class-vanadium-exploration it's, well eye-opening when you take body language into account.
In my opinion, having watched a lot of interviews by Matthew Gordon, he seemed to see through Peter. That's when alarm bells rang in my head.

Maybe Peter and the boys club, should take a long hard look at themselves and ask, 'Who they align with, apart from themselves that is?' if they care at all about the answer or the company?

'Lifestyle' CEO's, a phrase that could be applied to BoD members equally, seems to be a recent phrase banded about the networks - therefore who is more suitable, experienced or qualified to be on the Board...John Bennet or the current crop?